(1) Subject to the provisions of the Central Government. its own motion on an application for loan of multi state cooperative society call for and examine the proceedings in which no appeal lies to the appellate authority under for the purpose in multi state society of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of order made under this Act and if in any case it shall appear to Government that any such decision or order should be modified revised or remitted for reconsideration, the Central Government giving the party to be affected thereby a reasonable opportunity of tell pass such order thereon as it may deem fit Provided that the application to the Central Government exercise of the power under this section shall be profound pound ninety days from the date on which the decision or order application relates was communicated to the application for multi state cooperative society registration provided further that the Central Government may, if the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from application within the said period of ninety days, admit the application after the expiry of the said period. (2) The Central Government may suspend the execution of the decision or pending the exercise of its power under sub-section (1) in respect thereof. (3) The Central Government may award costs in proceedings under this paid out of the funds of the multi state cooperative society earned or by such party to the application for revision as the Central ferment may deem fit. Respondent No. 4 Bank filed proceedings before respondent No. 3 Deputy Registrar of cooperative societies against the petitioner and its partners and guarantors under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as, "the State Act, 1960"). After appearance the petitioner filed an application stating that respondent No. 4 Bank was governed by the provisions of the multi state cooperative societies Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the multi state Act, 2002 ") and, therefore, the proceedings can be filed only before Central Registrar and respondent No. 3 had no jurisdiction to try and act under Section 101 of the state Act, 1960. It is further stated that arguments were advanced on 20.10.2002 on the provisions of the multi state society Act, 2002 and the matter was reserved for orders on the point of applicability of the multi state Act, 2002. However, respondent No. 3 relying on Circular dated 8.1.2001, granted the recovery certificate without deciding the point of jurisdiction.