Notwithstanding anything contained in multi state cooperative society this Act, where, with the DUS sanction in writing of, or on requisition by, the Reserve Bank, amative bank- (b) in respect of which a scheme of amalgamation or reorganization is given effect to appeal there against shall lie or be permissible and the sanction or question of the Reserve Bank shall not be liable to be called in question. The 2002 Act is corresponding of the multi state cooperative society Act, 1984. Large are following changes (1) under provision for revision and review is not men tined, however, under the 1984 Act it was mentioned. (2) Sub-section (e)   deleted, which restricted appeal or revision where order for super session of Board and appointment of an administrator therefore has been made. Provides various orders and decisions against which appeal n be made to the appellate authorities. But lays down restriction appeal in certain cases. It provides that a cooperative bank is wound up in respect of which a scheme of amalgamation or reorganization is given act to with the previous sanction of Reserve Bank there no appeal lies. It is so provided that the sanction or requisition of the Reserve Bank is not liable being called in question. Only a small number of the millions of cases commenced each year are subject to a successful appeal. For example, over two million civil cases were commenced in the County Courts in 2007, whilst just 2574 applications for permission to appeal were made to the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal in the same period. It is vital the right exists as it ensures that if a judge does make an error of law or fact the means exist to correct it. In this sense the right of appeal as a form of explanatory accountability has two distinct (but overlapping) functions, one private and one public. These were first noted by the Roman legal scholar Justinian. When an applicant or petitioner appeals a decision to the officer who made the original decision will first review the record in cooperative society.  A review of the record will determine whether the evidence or argument submitted in the appeal warrants reopening or reconsidering the decision. If the adjudicating officer determines that reopening or reconsidering the decision is not warranted, the officer will forward the case for further review to the BIA. In a civil case either side may appeal the verdict. In a criminal case, the defendant may appeal a guilty verdict, but the government may not appeal if a defendant is found not guilty. Either side in a criminal case may be with respect to the sentence that is imposed after a guilty verdict. Now, you are at the final destination for gathering a good piece of information on the application of multi state cooperative society.