Notwith standing anything contained in this Act, no person shall be hold, at the same time, office of a President or Chairperson or Vicesident or Vice-Chairperson on the Board of more than two cooperative society Section 46 of the 2002 Act is corresponding to Section 36 of the 1984 Act .owing changes have been brought in the 2002 Act: (1) In 1984 Act provision was in respect to holding of office for more than multi state cooperative society, however, in the 2002 Act the number has been increased to two (2) Provisos to Section 36 of the 1984 Acthave been deleted which were related to holding of office of more than one multi state cooperative society at the commencement of 1984 Act, which has no practical utility now. Section 46 creates a bar to hold office of a President or Chairperson or cepresidsnr or Vice-Chairperson on the Board of more than two With election season upon us, and a near constant stream of public jabs and rebuttals between incumbents and their challengers, we should focus on something besides the Americans that are running for office. Instead, let’s turn our attention to a rather peculiar set of state laws relating to elections and nonreligious Americans.The Administration’s release of criminal illegal immigrants into our society is a dangerous promotion of President Obama’s political agenda at the expense of our collective safety. The Administration has used the current budget crisis and sequestration as an excuse to release criminals individuals who have been convicted of or charged with crimes such as fraud, drunk driving, or assault. Some are fugitives, suspected gang members, or have already received final order of deportation. There is never a situation in which criminal illegal immigrants should be released onto our streets.So, what do you think of these laws? Are they an affront to the secular nature of our local, state, and federal governments, or are they just antiquated but harmless relics from the past? Should there be an active effort to remove these anti-atheist provisions from the respective state constitutions, or should the nonreligious movement just let federal law trump these discriminatory provisions as conflicts arise in cooperative societies.