(1) Where by virtue of the provisions of the states Act, or any other enactment relating to states, any cooperative society which immediately before the reorganization takes place, had its objects confined to one state as from that day, a multi state cooperative society, it shall be a multi state cooperative society registered under the provisions of this Act and the bye-laws of such society shall, are, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, continue to until altered or rescinded. (2) If it appears to the Central Registrar or any officer au behalf by the Central Government aid to multi state cooperative society (hereafter in this section refer authorized officer) that it is necessary or expedient to reconstitute any society referred to in sub-section (1), the Central Registrar or the officer, as the case may be, may, with the previous approval Government, place before a meeting of the general body of that in such manner as may be prescribed, a scheme reorganization, including proposals regarding- (a) the formation of new multi state society transfer thereto in whole or in part, of the assets and society, or (b) the transfer, in whole or in part, of the assets and cooperative society to any other multi state cooperative society immediately before the date of that meeting of the (hereafter in this section referred to as the existing operative society). (3) If the scheme is sanctioned by a resolution passed by the members present at the said meeting, either without with modifications to which the central registrar or the agrees, he shall certify the scheme and upon such certification shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained regulation or bye-laws for the time being in force, be bin societies affected by the scheme, as well as the shareholders of all such societies. Another contention placed before us by the appellant was that the High Court erred in not considering the effect of Section 95 of the multi state Act which takes complete care of the situation arising out of reorganization of states on certain class of cooperative societies. He submitted that Section 67 of the Re-organization Act does not at all apply in the present case as section 95 of the multi state act already exists in the form of a central law which is sufficient to take care of cooperative societies which would become multi state cooperative societies from the day of reorganization of State. He further submitted that the cooperative societies are not created under any central act or state act but they are created by the members in accordance with the provisions of the central or state cooperative society acts, therefore, Section 67 of the reorganization act shall have no effect on functioning of the multi state cooperative societies. He next submitted that section of the reorganization Act did not apply in the present case as Section 86 extends the application of state laws to the territories of newly carved out State of Uttaranchal for a transitory period till the state of Uttaranchal makes its own local laws and under Section 87 the appropriate Government may make such laws within a period of two years in the multi state cooperative society. For enhancing your knowledge, you can pay a visit to the url about the application of multi state cooperative society.